Applicability of Ratings of Perceived Exertion as a Measure of Subjective Fatigue in First Responders: An Exploratory Study Original Research

Main Article Content

Michael Toczko https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-6945
Dr. Ali Boolani
Dr. Joel Martin

Keywords

physical energy, mental energy, mood states

Abstract

Introduction: Many researchers use Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE) as an indicator of subjective fatigue. Recent findings suggest that energy and fatigue are two distinct unipolar moods.


Methods: Eleven first responders (FR) participated in a 90-minute strenuous exercise battery where they ended the protocol by completing a graded VO2max test where they were asked to perform until volitional fatigue, measured through RPE. Subjective feelings of mental energy (ME) and fatigue (MF) and physical energy (PE) and fatigue (PF) were measured before the beginning of the protocol and right after. Data was not normally distributed and presented in median and interquartile ranges. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated for RPE, post mood state, and changes in mood states.


Results: Participants’ self-reported RPE at the conclusion of the VO2max test was 18.27 [18.00,19.00]. Post PE (r=-0.012, p=0.97), PF (r=-0.036, p=0.92), ME (r=-0.13, p=0.69), and MF (r=0.43, p=0.19) displayed insignificant correlations with RPE. Similarly, insignificant correlations were observed between changes in PE (r=0.26, p=0.44), PF (r=0.46, p=0.15), ME (r=0.35, p=0.30), MF (r=-0.43, p=0.19), and RPE. Five participants reported an increase in feelings of PE (15.00 [13.00,19.00]) and seven participants reported lower feelings of PF (-12.00 [-19.50,-8.00]) post assessment. Seven participants reported improvements in ME (22.00 [8.00,68.00]) and three reported a reduction in MF (-13.00 [-27.00, -7.00]).


Conclusions: Our findings suggests that self-reported RPE may not be a reliable measure of subjective fatigue in FR populations during acute strenuous exercise. Further our findings support previous work that ME, MF, PE, and PF are four distinct unipolar moods, and researchers seeking to assess fatigue in FR should use RPE with caution as it seems to be a measure of subjective perception of exercise intensity instead of a true measure of subjective fatigue.

Abstract 683 | PDF Downloads 340

References

1. Ricci JA, Chee E, Lorandeau AL, Berger J. Fatigue in the U.S. Workforce: Prevalence and Implications for Lost Productive Work Time: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2007;49(1):1-10. doi:10.1097/01.jom.0000249782.60321.2a
2. Bustos D, Guedes JC, Vaz MP, et al. Non-Invasive Physiological Monitoring for Physical Exertion and Fatigue Assessment in Military Personnel: A Systematic Review. IJERPH. 2021;18(16):8815. doi:10.3390/ijerph18168815
3. Bustos D, Cardoso F, Rios M, et al. Machine Learning Approach to Model Physical Fatigue during Incremental Exercise among Firefighters. Sensors. 2022;23(1):194. doi:10.3390/s23010194
4. Dijksma CI, Bekkers M, Spek B, Lucas C, Stuiver M. Epidemiology and financial burden of musculoskeletal injuries as the leading health problem in the military. Military medicine. 2020;185(3-4):e480-e486.
5. Butry DT, Webb D, Gilbert S, Taylor J. The Economics of Firefighter Injuries in the United States. National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2019:NIST TN 2078. doi:10.6028/NIST.TN.2078
6. Hjollund NH, Andersen JH, Bech P. Assessment of fatigue in chronic disease: a bibliographic study of fatigue measurement scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5(1):12. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-5-12
7. Learmonth YC, Dlugonski D, Pilutti LA, Sandroff BM, Klaren R, Motl RW. Psychometric properties of the Fatigue Severity Scale and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2013;331(1-2):102-107. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2013.05.023
8. Michielsen HJ, De Vries J, Van Heck GL. Psychometric qualities of a brief self-rated fatigue measure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2003;54(4):345-352. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00392-6
9. Loy BD, Cameron MH, O’Connor PJ. Perceived fatigue and energy are independent unipolar states: Supporting evidence. Medical Hypotheses. 2018;113:46-51. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2018.02.014
10. Boolani A, Gallivan KM, Ondrak KS, et al. Trait Energy and Fatigue May Be Connected to Gut Bacteria among Young Physically Active Adults: An Exploratory Study. Nutrients. 2022;14(3):466. doi:10.3390/nu14030466
11. Kluger BM, Krupp LB, Enoka RM. Fatigue and fatigability in neurologic illnesses. Neurology. 2013;80(4):409-416. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f07be
12. Tornero-Aguilera JF, Jimenez-Morcillo J, Rubio-Zarapuz A, Clemente-Suárez VJ. Central and peripheral fatigue in physical exercise explained: A narrative review. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2022;19(7):3909.
13. Valko PO, Bassetti CL, Bloch KE, Held U, Baumann CR. Validation of the Fatigue Severity Scale in a Swiss Cohort. Sleep. 2008;31(11):1601-1607. doi:10.1093/sleep/31.11.1601
14. Boolani A, O’Connor PJ, Reid J, Ma S, Mondal S. Predictors of feelings of energy differ from predictors of fatigue. null. 2019;7(1):12-28. doi:10.1080/21641846.2018.1558733
15. Cortes Rivera M, Mastronardi C, Silva-Aldana CT, Arcos-Burgos M, Lidbury BA. Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review. Diagnostics. 2019;9(3):91. doi:10.3390/diagnostics9030091
16. O’Connor PJ. Evaluation of four highly cited energy and fatigue mood measures. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2004;57(5):435-441. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2003.12.006
17. Adão Martins NR, Annaheim S, Spengler CM, Rossi RM. Fatigue Monitoring Through Wearables: A State-of-the-Art Review. Front Physiol. 2021;12:790292. doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.790292
18. Mcdowell CP, Campbell MJ, Herring MP. Sex-Related Differences in Mood Responses to Acute Aerobic Exercise. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2016;48(9):1798-1802. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000969
19. O’Connor PJ. Mental Energy: Developing a Model for Examining Nutrition-related Claims. Nutrition Reviews. 2006;64(7):S2-6.
20. Chen MJ, Fan X, Moe ST. Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2002;20(11):873-899. doi:10.1080/026404102320761787
21. Davis JA, Dorado S, Keays KA, Reigel KA, Valencia KS, Pham PH. Reliability and validity of the lung volume measurement made by the BOD POD body composition system. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2007;27(1):42-46. doi:10.1111/j.1475-097X.2007.00713.x
22. Sax van der Weyden M, Toczko M, Fyock-Martin M, Martin J. Relationship between a Maximum Plank Assessment and Fitness, Health Behaviors, and Moods in Tactical Athletes: An Exploratory Study. IJERPH. 2022;19(19):12832. doi:10.3390/ijerph191912832
23. Liguori G, American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2020.
24. Abbiss CR, Peiffer JJ, Meeusen R, Skorski S. Role of Ratings of Perceived Exertion during Self-Paced Exercise: What are We Actually Measuring? Sports Med. 2015;45(9):1235-1243. doi:10.1007/s40279-015-0344-5
25. Thomas M, Pohl MB, Shapiro R, Keeler J, Abel MG. Effect of Load Carriage on Tactical Performance in Special Weapons and Tactics Operators. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2018;32(2):554. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002323
26. Jo D, Bilodeau M. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in studies of fatigue-induced postural control alterations in healthy adults: Scoping review of quantitative evidence. Gait & Posture. 2021;90:167-178. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.08.015
27. Mahoney G, Martin J, Martin R, et al. Evidence that feelings of energy and fatigue are associated differently with gait characteristics and balance: an exploratory study. Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior. 2021;9(3):125-138. doi:10.1080/21641846.2021.1950405
28. Borg G. Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Human Kinetics; 1998:viii, 104.
29. Caetano Júnior PC, Castilho ML, Raniero L. Salivary Cortisol Responses and Session Ratings of Perceived Exertion to a Rugby Match and Fatigue Test. Percept Mot Skills. 2017;124(3):649-661. doi:10.1177/0031512517704340
30. Foster C, Florhaug JA, Franklin J, et al. A New Approach to Monitoring Exercise Training. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2001;15(1):109.
31. Haddad M, Stylianides G, Djaoui L, Dellal A, Chamari K. Session-RPE Method for Training Load Monitoring: Validity, Ecological Usefulness, and Influencing Factors. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2017;11. Accessed March 3, 2024. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2017.00612
32. Loy BD, O’Connor PJ. The effect of histamine on changes in mental energy and fatigue after a single bout of exercise. Physiology & behavior. 2016;153:7-18.

Most read articles by the same author(s)