The Negative Relationship Between Objectively Assessed Physical Activity and Total Smartphone Usage Direct Original Research

Main Article Content

Jessica Smith-Ricketts
Andrew Lepp
Jacob E. Barkley

Keywords

cellphone, walking, steps

Abstract

Introduction: Existing evidence supports a positive relationship between smartphone use and sedentary behavior (i.e., high smartphone use is associated with high sitting). While evidence supports that smartphone use during physical activity reduces intensity, the relationship between daily smartphone use and daily physical activity is equivocal. Prior research assessing these relationships has relied on self-report survey instruments. The purpose of this research was to assess the relationship between minutes of smartphone use and physical activity (steps) using objective measures.


Methods:  College-aged individuals (N = 50) completed a brief survey assessing daily screen time (min) and daily steps for the previous 10-days. This data was obtained from participants’ smartphone applications (e.g., “Health” and “Screen Time” apps) and the relationship was assessed.


Results: There was a near moderate effect size for a negative correlation between average smartphone use and steps (r = -0.25). Mixed model regression indicated that this relationship was significant (F = 3.65, p = 0.00019).


Conclusions: The results differ from prior research which has not reported a significant relationship between smartphone use and physical activity when using self-reported survey instruments. This difference highlights the need for additional research employing objective measures when assessing relationships between smartphone use and health behaviors.

Abstract 148 | PDF Downloads 99

References

1. Smith, A, Raine, L, Zickuhr. College students and technology (The Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project). Available on http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/College-students-andtechnology. Aspx. 2011.
2. Lepp, A, Barkley, JE, Karpinski, AC. The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and Satisfaction with Life in college students. Comput Hum Behav. 2014; 31: 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.049
3. Barkley, JE, Lepp, A, & Salehi-Esfahani, S. College students’ mobile telephone use is positively associated with sedentary behavior. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2016; 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827615594338
4. Barkley, JE, Lepp, A. Mobile phone use among college students is a sedentary leisure behavior which may interfere with exercise. Comput Hum Behav. 2016; 56: 29-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.001
5. Fennell, C, Barkley, JE, Lepp, A. The relationship between cell phone use, physical activity, and sedentary behavior in adults aged 18-80. Comput Hum Behav. 2019; 90: 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.044
6. Rebold, MJ, Lepp, A, Sanders, GJ, Barkley, JE. The impact of cell phone use on the intensity and liking of a bout of treadmill exercise. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125029
7. Barkley, JE, Lepp A. Cellular telephone use during free-living walking significantly reduces average walking speed. BMC Res Notes. 2016; 9(195). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2001-y
8. Prince, SA, Adamo, KB, Hamel, ME, Hardt, J, Gorber, SC, Tremblay, M. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: A systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5(56). https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-56
9. Amagasa, S, Kamada, M, Sasai, H, et al. How well iphones measure steps in free-living conditions: Cross-sectional validation study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2019; 7(1). doi:10.2196/10418
10. Adamakis, M. Criterion validity of iOS and Android applications to measure steps and distance in adults. Technologies. 2021; 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies9030055
11. Gibbons, RD, Hedeker, D. Application of random-effects probit regression models. J Consult Clin Psych. 1994; 62(2).
12. Hedeker, D, Gibbons, RD. MIXOR: A computer program for mixed-effects ordinal regression analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1996; 49(2).
13. Lepp, A, Barkley, JE, Sanders, GJ, Rebold, M, Gates, P. The relationship between cell phone use, physical and sedentary activity, and cardiorespiratory fitness in a sample of U.S. college students. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013; 10(79). https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-79
14. Bennett, GG, Wolin, KY, Viswanath, K, Askew, S, Puleo, E, Emmons, KM. Television viewing and pedometer-determined physical activity among multiethnic residents of low-income housing. Am J Public Health. 2006; 96: 1681-1685.
15. Kim, K, Milne, GR. Smart phone addiction and mindfulness: an intergenerational comparison. Int J Pharm Healthc Mark. 2018; 12(1): 25-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJPHM-08-2016-0044