Soft Tissue Mobilization Improves Neck and Upper Back Range of Motion

Main Article Content

Jeffrey Doeringer

Keywords

Pain Management, Injury Rehabilitation

Abstract

Introduction: Limited research reveals that the use of different soft tissue mobilization techniques increases tissue mobility and decreases pain in various regions of the body. The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a difference between instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and cupping therapy for neck and upper back discomfort.


Methods:  Subjects were treated for neck and upper back discomfort using one of two soft tissue mobilization techniques. They were assessed with a numeric rating scale, neck range of motions, and superficial skin temperature before and after each treatment to document changes observed.


Results: There was a statistically significant difference in range of motion, superficial skin temperature, and pain numeric rating scale regardless of the treatment (P <.05).


Conclusions: Both methods of soft tissue mobilization showed to have a significant impact on pain and neck range of motion. Based on patient-clinician collaborative treatment process, healthcare providers should consider IASTM and cupping therapy.

Abstract 42 | PDF Downloads 15

References

1. Mylonas K, Angelopoulos P, Billis E, et al. Combining targeted instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization applications and neuromuscular exercises can correct forward head posture and improve the functionality of patients with mechanical neck pain: a randomized control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22:212-221. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04080-4
2. Lauche R, Cramer H, Choi KE, Rampp T, Saha FJ, Dobos GJ, Musial F. The influence of a series of five dry cupping treatments on pain and mechanical thresholds in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain – a randomized controlled pilot study. BMC Complement and Altern Med. 2011;11:63-74.
3. Mahmood T, Hafeez M. Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization- an emerging trend for soft tissue dysfunction. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020;71(3):977-981.
4. Rozenfeld E, Kalichman L. New is the well-forgotten old: The use of dry cupping in musculoskeletal medicine. J Bodywork Movement Ther. 2016;20:173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.11.009
5. Kim J, Jun Sung D, Lee J. Therapeutic effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization for soft tissue injury; mechanism and practical application. J Exerc Rehabil. 2017;13(1):12-22. https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.1732824.412
6. Kim J, Cho J, Kwang-Sun D, et al. Effect of cupping therapy on range of motion, pain threshold, and muscle activity of the hamstring muscle compared to passive stretching. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2017;12(3):23-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2017.12.3.23
7. Bush H, Stanek J, Wooldridge J, Stephens S, Barrack J. Comparison of the Graston Technique with instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization for increasing dorsiflexion range of motion. J Sport Rehabil. 2021; 20:587-594. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0397
8. Fousekis K, Varda C, Mandalidis D, Mylonas K, Angelopoulos P, Koumoundourou D, Tsepis E. Effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization at three different applications angles on hamstring surface thermal responses. J Phys Ther Sci. 2020;32:506-509.
9. Portillo-Soto A, Eberman L, Demchak T, Peebles C. Comparison of blood flow changes with soft tissue mobilization and massage therapy. J Altern Complement Med. 2014;20:932-936. doi: 10.1089/acm.2014.0160
10. Al-Bedah A, Elsubai I, Quereshi N, Aboushanab T, Ali G, El-Olemy A, Khalil A, Khalil M, Alqaed M. The medical perspective of cupping therapy: effects and mechanism of action. J Tradit Complement Med. 2018;1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcme.2018.03.003
11. Moon J, Jung J, Won Y, Cho H. Immediate effects of Graston Technique on hamstring muscle extensibility and pain intensity in patients with nonspecific low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci 2017;29: 224-227.
12. Lee J, Lee H, & Oh J. the effect of Graston technique on the pain and range of motion in patients with chronic low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28:1852-1855. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.1852
13. Simatou M, Papandreou M, Bills E, Tsekoura M, Mylonas K, Fousekis K. Effects of the Ergon instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization technique (IASTM), foam rolling, and static stretching application to different parts of the myofascial lateral line on hip joint flexibility. J Phys Ther Sci. 2020;32:288-291. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.32.288
14. Laudner K, Compton B, McLoda T, Walters C. Acute effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization for improving posterior shoulder range of motion in college baseball players. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9:1-7.
15. Williams J, Gard H, Gregory J, Gibson A, Austin J. The effects of cupping on hamstring flexibility in college soccer payers. J Sport Rehabil. 2019;28:350-353. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2017-0199
16. Schafer M, Tom J, Girouard T, Navalta J, Turner C, Radzak K. Cupping therapy does not influence healthy adult’s hamstring range of motion compared to control or sham conditions. Int J Exerc Sci. 2020;13:216-224.
17. Teut M, Ullmann A, Ortiz M, Rotter G, Binting S, Cree M, Lotz F, Roll S, Brinkhaus B. Pulsatile dry cupping in chronic low back pain – a randomized three-armed controlled clinical trial. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2018;18:115-123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-018-2187-8
18. Crothers A, French S, Hebert J, Walker B. Spinal manipulative therapy, Graston technique and placebo for non-specific thoracic spine pain: a randomized controlled trial. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;24:16-24. doi:10.1186/x12998-016-0096-9