Memory for Gaze Cues Can Attenuate Change Blindness in the Flicker Paradigm Original Research
Main Article Content
Keywords
change detection, joint attention, scene perception
Abstract
Introduction: Observers often pay attention to objects that are the target of another’s gaze. The current experiments investigate if memory for gaze cues has similar effects on attention.
Methods: We used the flicker paradigm, in which participants searched for changes in pictures of real-world scenes. In experiment 1, half of the scenes depicted a person looking at the changing object, and the other half depicted no people. In experiment 2, none of the scenes in the flicker sequence contained people, but participants previewed pictures prior to the flicker sequence, and half of the previews depicted a person looking at the changing object.
Results: In both experiments, participants were faster to find changes when the changes were cued (Exp 1, t(20) = 2.55, p = .02; Exp 2, t(49) = 7.18, p < .001). Analysis of accuracy suggests it was not due to a speed-accuracy tradeoff.
Conclusions: These results suggest that memory for gaze cues may help guide attention. However, the results do not suggest one way or the other whether this effect is reflexive or unique to social cues.
References
2. Ristic J, Wright A, Kingstone A. Attentional control and reflexive orienting to gaze and arrow cues. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007;14(5):964-969. doi:10.3758/BF03194129
3. Frischen A, Tipper SP. Long-term gaze cueing effects: Evidence for retrieval of prior states of attention from memory. Vis Cogn. 2006;14(3):351-364. doi:10.1080/13506280544000192
4. Redcay E, O’Young D, Slevc LR, Mavros PL, Gabrieli JD, Sinha P. Gaze cues in complex, real-world scenes direct the attention of high-functioning adults with autism. Proc Annu Meet Cogn Sci Soc. 34. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7px9z6r2
5. Großekathöfer JD, Suchotzki K, Gamer M. Gaze cueing in naturalistic scenes under top-down modulation—Effects on gaze behaviour and memory performance. Vis Cogn. 2020;28(2):135-147. doi:10.1080/13506285.2020.1742826
6. Rensink RA, O’Regan JK, Clark JJ. To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychol Sci. 1997;8(5):368-373. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00427.x
7. Jensen MS, Yao R, Street WN, Simons DJ. Change blindness and inattentional blindness. WIREs Cogn Sci. 2011;2(5):529-546. doi:10.1002/wcs.130
8. Scholl BJ. Attenuated Change Blindness for Exogenously Attended Items in a Flicker Paradigm. Vis Cogn. 2000;7(1-3):377-396. doi:10.1080/135062800394856
9. The GIMP Development Team. GIMP. https://www.gimp.org
10. Peirce J, Gray JR, Simpson S, et al. PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behav Res Methods. 2019;51(1):195-203. doi:10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright, 2025 by the authors. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.