Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Emergence of Creative Displacement Anxiety Review

Main Article Content

Nicholas Caporusso

Keywords

generative AI, creativity, mental health, anxiety, stress, depression, stigma

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), a subset of AI that can generate novel content such as images, text, and music, has the unique transformative potential of augmenting human creativity, offering tools that can enhance creative expression and open unprecedented avenues for innovation. However, alongside its remarkable capabilities, the inevitable pervasive integration of this technology in every aspect of human life, including creative fields, involves the risk of giving rise to unforeseen psychological challenges for our society. This article discusses the potential emergence of a novel psychological phenomenon consisting in the multifaceted response to the perceived overshadowing of human creativity by AI-driven tools. Specifically, the article introduces the term “Creative Displacement Anxiety” (CDA), describe its foundation, and discuss its relationships with established psychological and psychosocial models, theories, constructs, and diagnoses such as technostress, impostor syndrome, cognitive dissonance, and economic anxiety. The article conceptualizes and elucidates the potential root causes, symptoms, and implications of CDA. Additionally, it discusses how some of the possible negative mental health outcomes could potentially be mitigated. Our work emphasizes the need for interventions that raise awareness on generative AI, support individuals in accepting and incorporating AI as a creative tool and companion and helps them navigate this new landscape. Finally, by offering a view of the interplay between AI advancements and the human creative psyche, our research aims at fostering the discussion around embracing the positive contribution of generative AI to our society.

Abstract 2537 | PDF Downloads 2054

References

1. Christensen CM, McDonald R, Altman EJ, Palmer JE. Disruptive innovation: An intellectual history and directions for future research. Journal of management studies. 2018;55(7):1043-1078.
2. Yao Y. Human-machine co-intelligence through symbiosis in the SMV space. Applied Intelligence. 2023;53(3):2777-2797.
3. Stahl BC, Stahl BC. Ethical issues of AI. Artificial Intelligence for a better future: An ecosystem perspective on the ethics of AI and emerging digital technologies. Published online 2021:35-53.
4. Bhangale KB, Desai P, Banne S, Rajput U. Neural Style Transfer: Reliving art through Artificial Intelligence. In: 2022 3rd International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET). IEEE; 2022:1-6.
5. Daugherty PR, Wilson HJ. Human+ Machine: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI. Harvard Business Press; 2018.
6. Krinkin K, Shichkina Y, Ignatyev A. Co-evolutionary hybrid intelligence. In: 2021 5th Scientific School Dynamics of Complex Networks and Their Applications (DCNA). IEEE; 2021:112-115.
7. Esling P, Devis N. Creativity in the era of artificial intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008 05959. Published online 2020.
8. Järveläinen H. Algorithmic musical composition. In: Seminar on Content Creation Art@ Science. University of Technology, Laboratory of Acoustics and Audio Signal; 2000.
9. Zarifhonarvar A. Economics of chatgpt: A labor market view on the occupational impact of artificial intelligence. Available at SSRN 4350925. Published online 2023.
10. Davenport TH, Kirby J. Only Humans Need Apply: Winners and Losers in the Age of Smart Machines. Harper Business New York; 2016.
11. Elgammal A, Liu B, Elhoseiny M, Mazzone M. Can: Creative adversarial networks, generating" art" by learning about styles and deviating from style norms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706 07068. Published online 2017.
12. Goenaga MA. A critique of contemporary artificial intelligence art: Who is Edmond de Belamy? AusArt. 2020;8(1):49-64.
13. Jiang HH, Brown L, Cheng J, et al. AI Art and its Impact on Artists. In: Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. ; 2023:363-374.
14. Newton A, Dhole K. Is AI Art Another Industrial Revolution in the Making? arXiv preprint arXiv:2301 05133. Published online 2023.
15. Howard J. Artificial intelligence: Implications for the future of work. American journal of industrial medicine. 2019;62(11):917-926.
16. Sawyer RK. Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford university press; 2011.
17. American Psychiatric Association D, Association AP, Others. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. Vol 5. American psychiatric association Washington, DC; 2013.
18. Postman N. Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. Penguin; 2005.
19. Winston B. Media, Technology and Society: A History: From the Telegraph to the Internet. Routledge; 2002.
20. Brod C. Technostress: The human cost of the computer revolution. (No Title). Published online 1984.
21. Ragu-Nathan TS, Tarafdar M, Ragu-Nathan BS, Tu Q. The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information systems research. 2008;19(4):417-433.
22. Carr N. The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. WW Norton & Company; 2020.
23. Twenge JM, Campbell WK. The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement. Simon and Schuster; 2009.
24. Primack BA, Shensa A, Sidani JE, et al. Social media use and perceived social isolation among young adults in the US. American journal of preventive medicine. 2017;53(1):1-8.
25. Arntz M, Gregory T, Zierahn U. The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Published online 2016.
26. Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. WW Norton & Company; 2014.
27. Chui M, Lund S, Gumbel P. How will automation affect jobs, skills, and wages. McKinsey Global Institute Viitattu. 2018;25:2019.
28. Bessen J. Artificial intelligence and jobs: The role of demand. In: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. University of Chicago Press; 2018:291-307.
29. Gunkel DJ. Communication and artificial intelligence: Opportunities and challenges for the 21st century. communication+ 1. 2012;1(1):1-25.
30. Mori M, MacDorman KF, Kageki N. The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & automation magazine. 2012;19(2):98-100.
31. Arnd-Caddigan M. Sherry Turkle: Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other: Basic Books, New York, 2011, 348 pp, ISBN 978-0465031467 (pbk). Published online 2015.
32. Sharkey A, Sharkey N. Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and information technology. 2012;14:27-40.
33. McCormack J, Gifford T, Hutchings P. Autonomy, authenticity, authorship and intention in computer generated art. In: International Conference on Computational Intelligence in Music, Sound, Art and Design (Part of EvoStar). Springer; 2019:35-50.
34. Eshraghian JK. Human ownership of artificial creativity. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2020;2(3):157-160.
35. Hertzmann A. Can computers create art? In: Arts. Vol 7. MDPI; 2018:18.
36. Mazzone M, Elgammal A. Art, creativity, and the potential of artificial intelligence. In: Arts. Vol 8. MDPI; 2019:26.
37. Rainie L, Anderson J. The future of jobs and jobs training. Published online 2017.
38. Brundage M. Taking superintelligence seriously: Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies by nick bostrom (Oxford university press, 2014). Futures. 2015;72:32-35.
39. Müller VC. Ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics. Published online 2020.
40. Winfield AFT, Jirotka M. Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2018;376(2133):20180085.
41. Floridi L, Cowls J, Beltrametti M, et al. AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. 28 (4): 689--707. Published online 2018.
42. Webb T, Holyoak KJ, Lu H. Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models. Nature Human Behaviour. Published online 2023:1-16.
43. Brown JNA, Esterle L. I’m already optimal: the Dunning-Kruger Effect, Sociogenesis, and Self-Integration. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing and Self-Organizing Systems Companion (ACSOS-C). IEEE; 2020:82-84.
44. Plass JL, Moreno R, Brünken R. Cognitive load theory. Published online 2010.
45. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology. 2012;1(20):416-436.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 12

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.