Considerations for Reporting Positive or Negative Findings in Psychology and Behavioral Research

Main Article Content

Daniel Maitland
Gabriel Sanders

Keywords

Psychology, Behavior, Research, Significance

Abstract

About Research Directs in Psychology and Behavior
Research Directs aims to provide authors at research and non-research institutions with an open access platform for scientific discovery that reduces cost barriers associated with traditional open access publishers. Research Directs in Psychology and Behavior (RDPB) has a moderately broad scope and the journal aims to enhance negative and positive findings1 in the psychology and behavioral sciences. Topics can include, but are not limited to the following categories: behavioral, clinical, industrial, forensic and environmental psychology, mental health, addictions, counseling, psychiatric treatment and outcomes and many more topics in the field.


Unique to Research Directs is a manuscript type called Direct Original Research. This is a manuscript type designed to provide authors with a direct way to publish various types of data that avoids excessive citations and unnecessary jargon that may disrupt the promptness of peer-review. As always, quality is paramount in research and haste in today’s fast-paced global environment is becoming imperative for scientific advancement. A Direct Original Research is the same as original research, but written in a concise manner with the goal of providing direct and citable research.

Abstract 184 | PDF Downloads 94

References

1. Martin GN, Clarke RM. Are Psychology Journals Anti-replication? A Snapshot of Editorial Practices. Front Psychol. 2017;8:523. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00523
2. Spector PE. Do Not Cross Me: Optimizing the Use of Cross-Sectional Designs. J Bus Psychol. 2019;34(2):125-137. doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8
3. Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using Effect Size-or Why the P Value Is Not Enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(3):279-282. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1
4. de Souza LML, Cabral HV, de Oliveira LF, Vieira TM. Motor units in vastus lateralis and in different vastus medialis regions show different firing properties during low-level, isometric knee extension contraction. Hum Mov Sci. 2018;58:307-314. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.12.012
5. Arunachalam L, Hunter IA, Killeen S. Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes Published in High-impact Surgical Journals. Ann Surg. 2017;265(6):1141-1145. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001795
6. Chuard PJC, Vrtilek M, Head ML, Jennions MD. Evidence that nonsignificant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting. PLoS biology. 2019;17(1). doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127
7. Gates S, Ealing E. Reporting and interpretation of results from clinical trials that did not claim a treatment difference: survey of four general medical journals. BMJ Open. 2019;9(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024785
8. Hazell L, Shakir SAW. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions. Drug Safety. 2006;29:385-396. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200629050-00003

Similar Articles

1-10 of 21

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.