The Impact of Emotional Self-Regulation on Performative Success for Professional Fighters Original Research
Main Article Content
Keywords
emotion regulation, athletic performance, winning percentage
Abstract
Introduction: Emotional self-regulation has been determined to be an important factor regarding outcomes for athletes. Previous research has examined strategies athletes use to regulate their emotions and their motivations for doing so. However, little research has examined how professional fighters utilize emotional self-regulation strategies and their impact on performance. Fighters have been perceived as aggressive and impulsive; hence it is important to examine how they regulate their emotions. The present study investigates the association of emotional self-regulation in professional fighters versus college-aged male nonfighters. The study also evaluates the relationship between emotional self-regulation and winning percentages in professional fighters.
Methods: The study used a sample of professional male fighters (n = 36) and college-aged nonfighters (n = 29). Participants completed measures examining difficulties with emotional self-regulation amongst other measures.
Results: Despite no differences with professional fighters and the comparison group, difficulties with emotion regulation were negatively correlated with winning percentages (DERS-18 total scores p = .003; Awareness p = .036; Goals p = .005, and Nonacceptance p = .005). Findings also suggest significant differences (p ≤ .05) for professional fighters based upon promotion, concussions, and education level.
Conclusions: These findings may contribute to understanding how emotional self-regulation factors into professional fighters’ performative success.
References
2. Tamminen KA KJ, Danyluck C, McEwen CE., Wagstaff CRD, Wolf SA. The effect of self- and interpersonal emotion regulation on athletes’ anxiety and goal achievement in competition. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2021;57.
3. Próchnik P. Psychological profile of Polish skydivers. Psychological Reports. 2011;108(1):263-273.
4. Collins D, Willmott T, Collins L. Periodization and self-regulation in action sports: Coping with the emotional load. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018;9:7.
5. Massey WV, Meyer BB, Naylor AH. Self-regulation strategies in mixed martial arts. Journal of Sport Behavior. 2015;38(2):192-211.
6. Lane AM, Beedie CJ, Jones MV, Uphill M, Devonport TJ. The BASES expert statement on emotion regulation in sport. Journal of sports sciences. 2012;30(11):1189-1195.
7. Steiner H, Denny K, Stemmle P. Adaptive styles in elite collegiate athletes: the role of activation and self-regulation. Personality and Mental Health. 2010;4(3):163-171.
8. Lane AM, Beedie CJ, Devonport TJ, Stanley DM. Instrumental emotion regulation in sport: relationships between beliefs about emotion and emotion regulation strategies used by athletes. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2011;21(6):e445-e451.
9. Lane AM, Wilson MG, Whyte GP, Shave R. Physiological correlates of emotion-regulation during prolonged cycling performance. Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback. 2011;36(3):181-184.
10. Beedie CJ, Lane AM, Wilson MG. A possible role for emotion and emotion regulation in physiological responses to false performance feedback in 10 mile laboratory cycling. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2012;37(4):269-277.
11. Wagstaff CRD. Emotion regulation and sport performance. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 2014;36(4):401-412.
12. Kucharski B, Strating MA, Ahluwalia Cameron A, Pascual-Leone A. Complexity of emotion regulation strategies in changing contexts: A study of varsity athletes. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. 2018;10:85-91.
13. González-Hernández J, Capilla Díaz C, Gómez-López M. Impulsiveness and cognitive patterns. Understanding the perfectionistic responses in Spanish competitive junior athletes. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10:8.
14. Dupee M, Werthner P, Forneris T. A preliminary study on the relationship between athletes' ability to self-regulate and world ranking. Biofeedback. 2015;43(2):57-63.
15. Altfeld S, Langenkamp H, Beckmann J, Kellmann M. Measuring the effectiveness of psychologically oriented basketball drills in team practice to improve self-regulation. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2017;12(6):725-736.
16. Victor SE, Klonsky ED. Validation of a brief version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-18) in five samples. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2016;38(4):582-589.
17. Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2004;26(1):41-54.
18. Lutz J, Gross RT, Vargovich AM. Difficulties in emotion regulation and chronic pain-related disability and opioid misuse. Addictive Behaviors. 2018;87:200.
19. Teffer K, Semendeferi K. Human prefrontal cortex: evolution, development, and pathology. Prog Brain Res. 2012;195:191-218.
20. Chen MA, Cheesman DJ. Mental toughness of mixed martial arts athletes at different levels of competition. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2013;116(3):905-917.
21. Hardy L, Jones JG, Gould D. Understanding psychological preparation for sport: Theory and practice of elite performers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ; 1996.
22. Kaufman KA, Glass CR, Pineau TR. Pathways from MSPE to peak performance. In: Mindful sport performance enhancement: Mental training for athletes and coaches. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC; 2018:145-162, Chapter xv, 304 Pages.
23. van der Horn HJ, Liemburg EJ, Scheenen ME, et al. Brain network dysregulation, emotion, and complaints after mild traumatic brain injury. Human Brain Mapping. 2016;37(4):1645-1654.
24. van der Horn HJ, Mangina NR, Rakers SE, et al. White matter microstructure of the neural emotion regulation circuitry in mild traumatic brain injury. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2021;53(10):3463-3475.
25. Martin RE, Ochsner KN. The neuroscience of emotion regulation development: Implications for education. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2016;10:142-148.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright, 2024 by the authors. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.