Machine Resistance Curve Analysis of Seven Resistance Training Machines Original Research

Main Article Content

Charles McMillin
Bridget Melton
Nicholas Murray
Chris D'Adamo

Keywords

multi-joint machines, single joint machines, resistance selection

Abstract

Introduction: Resistance training (RT) is not only feasible but also widely recommended across a spectrum of chronic disease contexts as well as for those with functional limitations. Many RT machines incorporate mechanisms that alter the machine’s resistance curve (MRC) in an attempt to match the variable strength of the participant through a resisted ROM (RROM).  Several investigations have tested this relationship using weight selections greater than what might be appropriate for targeting low to moderate training  intensities. This article presents an analysis of low to moderate RT selections offered by seven RT machines.


Methods: An evaluation of the MRCs of seven RT machines was performed. Three leg extension machines, two chest press machines, and two seated row machines were selected for analysis from three fitness centers in Baltimore, MD and Oklahoma City, OK. The method of analysis is described. The acquired force data were normalized and plotted in order to categorize the MRCs of each machine.


Results: Four of the seven machines offered more than one MRC based on the weight selected.


Conclusions: The selection of resistance on an individual machine might influence targeted factors such as participant effort or achievable RROM.

Abstract 63 | PDF Downloads 109

References

1. Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Exercise as medicine - evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25:1–72.
2. Eijsvogels TM, Thompson PD. Exercise Is Medicine: At Any Dose? JAMA. 2015;314(18):1915-1916.
3. Corcos DM, Robichaud JA, David FJ, et al. A two-year randomized controlled trial of progressive resistance exercise for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2013;28(9):1230–1240.
4. D’Adamo CR, McMillin CR, Chen KW, Lucas EK, Berman BM. Supervised resistance exercise for patients with persistent symptoms of Lyme disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(11):2291-2298.
5. Feiereisen P, Delagardelle C, Vaillant M, Lasar Y, Beissel J. Is strength training the more efficient training modality in chronic heart failure? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(11):1910-1917.
6. Chiosso J. The Gymnastic Polymachinon: Instructions for Performing a Systematic Series of Exercises on the Gymnastic & Calisthenic Polymachinon. Walton and Maberly; 1855:9-14.
7. Sargent DA, Sargent LW. Dudley Allen Sargent: an autobiography. Lea and Febiger; 1927.
8. Levertin A, Zander G. Dr. G. Zander's Medico-Mechanical Gymnastics: Its method, importance, and application. Norstedt; 1893.
9. Taylor CF. Infantile paralysis, and its attendant deformities. Lippincott; 1867.
10. Jones A. Time machines. Nautilus Sport/Medical Industries; 1978.
11. Callam Lurvey P, Chandler JM, Malone TR. Differences in force production on various isotonic loading devices. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 1991;1(2):75–80.
12. Folland J, Morris B. Variable-cam resistance training machines: Do they match the angle-torque relationship in humans? J Sports Sci. 2008;26(2):163–169.
13. Syrotuik DG. Resistive torque analysis of the Nautilus leg extension machine [dissertation]. National Library of Canada; 1986.
14. Harman EA. Resistive torque analysis of 5 Nautilus exercise machines. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983;(15):113.
15. Johnson JH, Colodny S, Jackson D. Human torque capability versus machine resistive torque for four Eagle resistance machines. J Appl Sport Sci Res. 1990;4:83-87.
16. Enoka R. Neuromechanics of human movement. Human Kinetics; 2015.
17. Kulig K, Andrews JG, Hay JG. Human strength curves. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1984;12(1):417-466.
18. Gordon AM, Huxley AF, Julian FJ. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1966;184(1):170–192.
19. Herzog W, Read LJ. Lines of action and moment arms of the major force-carrying structures crossing the human knee joint. J Anat. 1993;182:213-230.
20. Cabell L, Zebas C. Resistive torque validation of the Nautilus multi-biceps machine. J Strength Cond Res. 1999;13(1):20-23.
21. Ciccarelli C. Evaluation of resistive torque patterns of dynamic variable resistance machines and human strength curves. Springfield College; 2001:3-18.
22. Fleck SJ, Kraemer WJ. Designing resistance training programs. Human Kinetics; 2014.