Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness: A Prediction Error Brief Review

Main Article Content

Christopher Hunt

Keywords

eccentric exercise, predictive processing, evolutionary biology

Abstract

Delayed-onset muscle soreness is a common and well-researched phenomenon among exercising populations, whose symptoms can impair movement quality and subsequent participation in activities. Traditional explanations have focused mostly on tissue and cellular damage and the body’s inflammatory responses. This has led to many hypotheses that often do not fully agree with one another or adequately capture the complexity of the matter. Principles of evolutionary biology have previously been applied to phenomena in exercise science and seem well-suited to interpreting this issue. This brief review introduces a unifying theoretical framework that shifts the perspective from mainly tissue- and cellular-level explanations to centrally mediated predictive processes, incorporating principles from evolutionary biology and predictive processing theory.

Abstract 26 | PDF Downloads 31

References

1. Cheung K, Hume PA, Maxwell L. Delayed onset muscle soreness: Treatment strategies and performance factors. Sports Med. 2003;33(2):145-164. doi:10.2165/00007256-200333020-00005
2. Hotfiel T, Freiwald J, Hoppe M, et al. Advances in delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS): Part I: pathogenesis and diagnostics. Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2018;32(04):243-250. doi:10.1055/a-0753-1884
3. Mizumura K, Taguchi T. Delayed onset muscle soreness: Involvement of neurotrophic factors. J Physiol Sci. 2016;66(1):43-52. doi:10.1007/s12576-015-0397-0
4. Morgan DL, Proske U. Popping sarcomere hypothesis explains stretch‐induced muscle damage. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2004;31(8):541-545. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1681.2004.04029.x
5. Gulick DT, Kimura IF. Delayed onset muscle soreness: What is it and how do we treat it? J Sport Rehabil. 1996;5(3):234-243. doi:10.1123/jsr.5.3.234
6. Taborsky B, English S, Fawcett TW, et al. Towards an evolutionary theory of stress responses. Trends Ecol Evol. 2021;36(1):39-48. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2020.09.003
7. Nesse RM, Schulkin J. An evolutionary medicine perspective on pain and its disorders. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2019;374(1785):20190288. doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0288
8. Theriault JE, Katsumi Y, Reimann HM, et al. It’s not the thought that counts: Allostasis at the core of brain function. Neuron. 2025;113(24):4107-4133. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2025.09.028
9. Tucker R, Noakes TD. The physiological regulation of pacing strategy during exercise: A critical review. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(6):e1. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2009.057562
10. Ishikawa R, Ono G, Izawa J. Bayesian surprise intensifies pain in a novel visual-noxious association. Cognition. 2025;257:106064. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106064
11. Noakes TD. Time to move beyond a brainless exercise physiology: The evidence for complex regulation of human exercise performance. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011;36(1):23-35. doi:10.1139/H10-082
12. O’Malley CA, Smith SA, Mauger AR, Norbury R. Exercise‐induced pain within endurance exercise settings: Definitions, measurement, mechanisms and potential interventions. Exp Physiol. 2024;109(9):1446-1460. doi:10.1113/EP091687
13. Lieberman DE. Is exercise really medicine? An evolutionary perspective. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2015;14(4):313-319. doi:10.1249/JSR.0000000000000168
14. Dobzhansky T. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am Biol Teach. 1973;35(3):125-129. doi:10.2307/4444260
15. Hipólito I, Kirchhoff M. Breaking boundaries: The Bayesian Brain Hypothesis for perception and prediction. Conscious Cogn. 2023;111:103510. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2023.103510
16. Noakes TD. Fatigue is a brain-derived emotion that regulates the exercise behavior to ensure the protection of whole body homeostasis. Front Physiol. 2012;3. doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00082
17. Swart J, Lindsay TR, Lambert MI, Brown JC, Noakes TD. Perceptual cues in the regulation of exercise performance – physical sensations of exercise and awareness of effort interact as separate cues. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(1):42-48. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2011-090337
18. Beaven CM, Willis SJ, Cook CJ, Holmberg HC. Physiological comparison of concentric and eccentric arm cycling in males and females. Lucia A, ed. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e112079. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112079
19. Hody S, Croisier JL, Bury T, Rogister B, Leprince P. Eccentric muscle contractions: Risks and benefits. Front Physiol. 2019;10:536. doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00536
20. Peñailillo L, Mackay K, Abbiss CR. Rating of perceived exertion during concentric and eccentric cycling: Are we measuring effort or exertion? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(4):517-523. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2017-0171
21. Moseley GL. Reconceptualising pain according to modern pain science. Phys Ther Rev. 2007;12(3):169-178. doi:10.1179/108331907X223010
22. Nesse RM. Natural selection and the regulation of defenses. Evol Hum Behav. 2005;26(1):88-105. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.002
23. McHugh MP, Connolly DAJ, Eston RG, Gleim GW. Exercise-induced muscle damage and potential mechanisms for the repeated bout effect. Sports Med. 1999;27(3):157-170. doi:10.2165/00007256-199927030-00002

Similar Articles

21-30 of 34

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.