Utilizing the Maximum Workload Range for Practice Periodization Commentary

Main Article Content

Gabriel J. Sanders
Corey A. Peacock

Keywords

Sports, Workloads, Overtraining, Undertraining, Training Load

Abstract

PodScholars Research Podcast


The maximum workload range (max range) is a concept suggested by Sanders et al.1 regarding a method used to prescribe adequate practice workloads based off wearable technology data. The max range is calculated as follows from game data:


Max Range = (Mean Total Distance + 1 St. Dev.) to (Maximum Total Distance)


While the example provided utilizes total distance, the max range can be applied to key performance indicators such as  high-speed distance, training load, jumps, etc. that are tracked throughout the competitive season in team sports. The max range concept was developed from research that found 12-17% of the time, football athletes, depending on position, accumulated game workloads outside their position’s mean + 1SD. Anecdotally, many coaches and practitioners use simple game averages as a control for ideal practice volumes. Based on previous research, using the game average as control training threshold may result in some high performing athletes being under-conditioned. It is reasonable to suggest that potential compound effects may occur throughout an entire season if athletes are not engaging in rigorous training loads that mimic game-like volumes and intensities.


Figure 1. Theoretical football periodization structure for a defensive back using the max range for high intensity training days.


Abstract 499 | PDF Downloads 269 PodScholars Podcast Downloads 0

References

1. Sanders GJ, Roll B, Peacock CA, Kollock RO. Maximum Movement Workloads and High-Intensity Workload Demands by Position in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football. J Strength Cond Res. 2020;34(7):1974-1981.
2. Sanders GJ, Boos B, Rhodes J, Kollock RO, Peacock CA. Competition-Based Heart Rate, Training Load, and Time Played Above 85% Peak Heart Rate in NCAA Division I Women's Basketball. J Strength Cond Res. 2021;35(4):1095-1102.
3. Sanders GJ, Roll B, Peacock CA. Maximum Distance and High-Speed Distance Demands by Position in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football Games. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(10):2728-2733.
4. Sanders GJ, Boos B, Shipley F, Scheadler CM, Peacock CA. An Accelerometer-Based Training Load Analysis to Assess Volleyball Performance. J Exerc Nutri. 2018;1(1).
5. Sanders GJ, Boos B, Rhodes J, Kollock RO, Peacock CA, Scheadler CM. Factors associated with minimal changes in countermovement jump performance throughout a competitive division I collegiate basketball season. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(19):2236-2242.
6. Stojanovic E, Stojiljkovic N, Scanlan AT, Dalbo VJ, Berkelmans DM, Milanovic Z. The Activity Demands and Physiological Responses Encountered During Basketball Match-Play: A Systematic Review. Sports Med. 2018;48(1):111-135.
7. Ben Abdelkrim N, Castagna C, El Fazaa S, El Ati J. The effect of players' standard and tactical strategy on game demands in men's basketball. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(10):2652-2662.
8. Ben Abdelkrim N, El Fazaa S, El Ati J. Time-motion analysis and physiological data of elite under-19-year-old basketball players during competition. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41(2):69-75.
9. Berkelmans DM, Dalbo VJ, Kean CO, et al. Heart Rate Monitoring in Basketball: Applications, Player Responses, and Practical Recommendations. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(8):2383-2399.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 23

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)