The Influence of a Supervised and Unsupervised Strength and Conditioning Program for Elite Adolescent Freestyle Swimmers Case Study
Main Article Content
Keywords
Adolescent swimmers, Strength and conditioning., Exercise adherence
Abstract
Introduction: Adolescent high school swimmers, aged 13-16 years, are an athletic population that can benefit from a strength and conditioning (S&C) program which caters for their developmental and sports-specific needs. The aim of this case study was to analyze the adherence to and subsequent effect of a short-term (12-week) combined supervised and unsupervised S&C program in elite adolescent swimmers during a competitive season.
Methods: Seven elite adolescent swimmers (4 females, 3 males) completed the study (age: 15.2 ± 0.5 years; mass: 64.5 ± 5.1 kg; stature: 1.76 ± 0.07 m). The participants were required to adhere to one supervised S&C session and two unsupervised S&C sessions per week that were performed on non-consecutive days while maintaining their traditional swimming training schedules. The unsupervised component was delivered digitally with participant feedback monitored. The S&C program consisted of upper- and lower limbs exercises with low loads and low volume as well as bodyweight exercise. Adherence to both programs was measured by attendance with correlational analysis conducted from total S&C program adherence to swim performance. The effect of the S&C training protocol was assessed using performance time pre and post the S&C intervention during the 50-m freestyle swim.
Results: The S&C training program intervention resulted in significant improvements in the 50-m freestyle swim (p < 0.001, d = >1). Total adherence to the supervised and unsupervised parts of the S&C program was 88% while adherence to the digital only component was 76%. Although a correlation was observed between total adherence to the combined supervised and unsupervised S&C program (r = 0.8, p = 0.0243) and improved 50 m freestyle swim performance, this was not the case when the unsupervised component was compared to swim time performance (r = 0.4, p = 0.679).
Conclusions: This case study demonstrated that a 12-week S&C intervention has a positive effect on elite adolescents’ 50 m freestyle swim performance. Furthermore, swim performance was improved when participant adherence to both formats of the S&C program were met. This study supports the development of S&C interventions to develop these correlates and increase adherence.
References
2. Faigenbaum A, Kraemer W, Blimkie C, Jeffreys I, Micheli L, Nitka M, Rowland T. Youth resistance training: Updated position statement paper from the National Strength and Conditioning Association. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23: S60–S79.
3. Case R, Branch, J. Event marketing: An examination of selected demographic and psychographic data of participants competing in the World’s foremost off-road triathlon event. Int Sports J. 2018;5(1).
4. Fry AC. The role of resistance exercise on muscle fiber adaptations. Sports Med. 2004;34(10):663–679.
5. Myers AM, Beam NW, Fakhoury JD. Resistance training for children and adolescents. Transl Pediatr. 2017; 6(3):137-143. 5.
6. Dahab KS, McCambridge TM. Strength training in children and adolescents: raising the bar for young athletes? Sports Health. 2009;3:223-6.
7. Lloyd RS, Cronin JB, Faigenbaum AD, et al. National Strength and Conditioning Association position statement on long-term athletic development. J Strength Cond Res 2016;30:1491-1509.
8. Faigenbaum AD, Lloyd RS, MacDonald J, Myer GD. Citius, altius, fortius: beneficial effects of resistance training for young athletes: narrative review. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:3-7.
9. Gąsior JS, Pawłowski M, Jeleń PJ, Rameckers EA, Williams CA, Makuch R, Werner B. Test-retest reliability of handgrip strength measurement in children and preadolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):
10. Kraemer W, Fleck S. Strength training for young athletes (2nd ed.). Human Kinetics, 2005.
11. Maglischo EW. Reducing resistance. Swimming Fastest. Human Kinetics, 2003.
12. Monu JM. Sport-specific training fora competitive freestyle sprint swimmer. Strength Cond J. 2013;35:48–55
13. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press; 1992.
14. Girold S, Maurin D, Dugue' B, Hatard CC, Emillet G. Effects of dry-land vs resisted-and assisted-sprint exercises on swimming sprint performances. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21:599–605
15. Keiner M, Yaghobi D, Sander A, Wirth K, Hartmann H. The influence of maximal strength performance of upper and lower extremities and trunk muscles on different sprint swim performances in adolescent swimmers. J Sci sports. (2015) 6:147–54.
16. Hollander AP, De Groot G, Van Ingen Schenau GJ, Kahman R, Toussaint HM. Contribution of the legs to propulsion in swimming. Swimming Science V. Human Kinetics, 1988.
17. Sirur R, Richardson J, Wishart L, Hanna S. The role of theory in increasing adherence to prescribed practice. Physiother. Can. 2009;61.
18. Spring B, Champion K, Acabchuk R, Hennessy E. Self-regulatory behaviour change techniques in interventions to promote healthy eating, physical activity, or weight loss: A meta-review. Health Psychol. Rev; 2020.
19. Sylvester B, Curran T, Standage M, Sabiston C, Beauchamp R. Predicting exercise motivation and exercise behavior: A moderated mediation model testing the interaction between perceived exercise variety and basic psychological needs satisfaction. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2018;36.
20. Faigenbaum AD, Kraemer WJ, Cahill, et al. Youth resistance training: Position statement paper and literature review. J Strength Cond Res. 1996;18:62
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright, 2025 by the authors. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.